<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Firefox 3.5 Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/</link>
	<description>Blogging about our company, our users and our future plans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:27:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Artyom</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Artyom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-912</guid>
		<description>Strange that pipelining is turned off by default. Open new tab, type about:config, agree to the note, and type first letters like &quot;pipe&quot; — there you&#039;ll see four pipelining options. Change False to True by doubleclicking each, restart firefox and voila, your Firefox is now able to load internet in parallel streams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange that pipelining is turned off by default. Open new tab, type about:config, agree to the note, and type first letters like &#8220;pipe&#8221; — there you&#8217;ll see four pipelining options. Change False to True by doubleclicking each, restart firefox and voila, your Firefox is now able to load internet in parallel streams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-835</guid>
		<description>I suspect Vecuccio is either using the typical &quot;weasel words&quot; when he says &quot;I and most others find it bloated and slow, not to mention about as stable as a retard in a hall of mirrors !&quot; Either that, or he&#039;s just a Windows fanboy who just talks out of his arse without any real evidence or experience to support his bloviations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Vecuccio is either using the typical &#8220;weasel words&#8221; when he says &#8220;I and most others find it bloated and slow, not to mention about as stable as a retard in a hall of mirrors !&#8221; Either that, or he&#8217;s just a Windows fanboy who just talks out of his arse without any real evidence or experience to support his bloviations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by CyberLowdown</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by CyberLowdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-781</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by CyberLowdown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by CyberLowdown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-778</guid>
		<description>I for one am very pleased with the progress Firefox has made. I&#039;ve been a user since early days, and I eagerly look forward to each new release. And once again they don&#039;t disappoint. I love InPrivate for Banking and such, just that tiny bit more security. Also I honestly notice the speed difference, especially on my slightly older machines. and it purrs along at 99MB of RAM with 10 tabs open for me, so I don&#039;t know what is causing other people&#039;s 600+MB woes.

Now if only the rest of the browsers would ratify a solid HTML5 standard, rather than being flimsy on the issue. I for one think they are just too lazy to upgrade their codebase to support some of the best of the new features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am very pleased with the progress Firefox has made. I&#8217;ve been a user since early days, and I eagerly look forward to each new release. And once again they don&#8217;t disappoint. I love InPrivate for Banking and such, just that tiny bit more security. Also I honestly notice the speed difference, especially on my slightly older machines. and it purrs along at 99MB of RAM with 10 tabs open for me, so I don&#8217;t know what is causing other people&#8217;s 600+MB woes.</p>
<p>Now if only the rest of the browsers would ratify a solid HTML5 standard, rather than being flimsy on the issue. I for one think they are just too lazy to upgrade their codebase to support some of the best of the new features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Cazelais</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Cazelais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-703</guid>
		<description>The main default of the 3.5 is its slowness to start.  It takes minutes, sometime a lot of them, to start up.  It&#039;s very annoying.  It&#039;s OK after that, except that it does not use less memory than the 3.0, as advertised.  As many as 600 Megs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main default of the 3.5 is its slowness to start.  It takes minutes, sometime a lot of them, to start up.  It&#8217;s very annoying.  It&#8217;s OK after that, except that it does not use less memory than the 3.0, as advertised.  As many as 600 Megs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-702</guid>
		<description>The private browsing is one that I was not aware of. Thanks for the list. I&#039;m glad that firefox is faster now. I have had problems with ff being too slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The private browsing is one that I was not aware of. Thanks for the list. I&#8217;m glad that firefox is faster now. I have had problems with ff being too slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-689</guid>
		<description>@John L LOL too bad about Location aware browsing! And Forget this site is useful if you are on a friend&#039;s computer, or at work, etc. Well, in theory anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John L LOL too bad about Location aware browsing! And Forget this site is useful if you are on a friend&#8217;s computer, or at work, etc. Well, in theory anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John L</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>John L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t know what Venuccio&#039;s problem is. Firefox has always been rock stable unlike IE7 (you can forget that piece of poop called IE8) and Opera. Mind you the benefits you have listed make no difference to me. I have not noticed any difference in speed with 3.5 over the previous version at all, it feels exactly the same. HTML 5 ?  Private browsing seems fairly pointless as I delete everything whenever I shut Firefox. I cannot imagine Forget this Site being of any benefit for hardly anyone. Location Aware browsing appears not to be working on my computer unless I go to a porn site where there is always dubious young ladies in my area but then there was with the previous version.
I love Firefox to bits but apart from the tab bar I cannot see any difference at all. But then there wasn&#039;t a lot to be able to improve on to be fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know what Venuccio&#8217;s problem is. Firefox has always been rock stable unlike IE7 (you can forget that piece of poop called IE8) and Opera. Mind you the benefits you have listed make no difference to me. I have not noticed any difference in speed with 3.5 over the previous version at all, it feels exactly the same. HTML 5 ?  Private browsing seems fairly pointless as I delete everything whenever I shut Firefox. I cannot imagine Forget this Site being of any benefit for hardly anyone. Location Aware browsing appears not to be working on my computer unless I go to a porn site where there is always dubious young ladies in my area but then there was with the previous version.<br />
I love Firefox to bits but apart from the tab bar I cannot see any difference at all. But then there wasn&#8217;t a lot to be able to improve on to be fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-683</guid>
		<description>I agree that 3.5 is a lot faster, and so far perfectly stable. Just a pity that some add-on&#039;s don&#039;t work first time, but it is fairly easy to force install, or change the maxversion, and they seem Ok then.

One factor that seemed to be a problem with 3.0 was that it did not always interpret CAPTCHA images correctly so it made it difficult to log on to certain sites. Seems as though this has been put right in 3.5.

GREAT !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that 3.5 is a lot faster, and so far perfectly stable. Just a pity that some add-on&#8217;s don&#8217;t work first time, but it is fairly easy to force install, or change the maxversion, and they seem Ok then.</p>
<p>One factor that seemed to be a problem with 3.0 was that it did not always interpret CAPTCHA images correctly so it made it difficult to log on to certain sites. Seems as though this has been put right in 3.5.</p>
<p>GREAT !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/07/top-5-firefox-35-features/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=765#comment-676</guid>
		<description>@Venuccio Sorry to hear that. For me it is a lot faster than the previous version and all my add-ons work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Venuccio Sorry to hear that. For me it is a lot faster than the previous version and all my add-ons work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
