Comments on: Google Chrome 2 – the Good and the Disappointing http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/ Blogging about our company, our users and our future plans. Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:48:26 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: anon http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-603 anon Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:42:15 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-603 Grab some of the Sysinternals (now windows) file and registry monitoring tools, install Chrome, and you will be able to SEE what it's doing to make your hard drive thrash. Grab some of the Sysinternals (now windows) file and registry monitoring tools, install Chrome, and you will be able to SEE what it’s doing to make your hard drive thrash.

]]> By: andrew http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-601 andrew Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:18:51 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-601 @Mantas it's funny! Google could provide easier way to stop GoogleUpdate. It's not a good way to run this proccess using Task Scheduler. I would prefer to have an ability to stop it right in settings. @Mantas it’s funny! Google could provide easier way to stop GoogleUpdate. It’s not a good way to run this proccess using Task Scheduler. I would prefer to have an ability to stop it right in settings.

]]> By: admin http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-600 admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:32:28 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-600 @Clay Sure, you are right, but I can also understand why ESET raised that point. They are concerned, that with the same level of protection, but faster JavaScript execution computers might become more vulnerable to malware. @Clay Sure, you are right, but I can also understand why ESET raised that point. They are concerned, that with the same level of protection, but faster JavaScript execution computers might become more vulnerable to malware.

]]> By: admin http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-599 admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:27:47 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-599 @Rodrigo Asensio So I take it Chrome doesn't make your hard drive churn constantly? Because that's what makes me concerned. @Rodrigo Asensio So I take it Chrome doesn’t make your hard drive churn constantly? Because that’s what makes me concerned.

]]> By: admin http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-598 admin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:26:11 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-598 @Mantas thanks for the tip! @Mantas thanks for the tip!

]]> By: Marty http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-590 Marty Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:28:26 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-590 Don't forget the obvious disappointment about Chrome 2 - still no Apple Mac version! Don’t forget the obvious disappointment about Chrome 2 – still no Apple Mac version!

]]> By: Flipouk http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-589 Flipouk Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:04:55 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-589 Disappointing: Windows only :( Disappointing: Windows only :(

]]> By: tom http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-588 tom Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:03:32 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-588 Problems with proxy authorization. I have to switch back to ff. Problems with proxy authorization. I have to switch back to ff.

]]> By: Clay http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-587 Clay Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:39:15 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-587 Sorry if I missed something here but... the "is speed safe" argument suggests that faster JavaScript is bad because malware operates faster. To me that logic suggests a faster CPU must be worse than a slower one because it will execute malware faster (same for a faster internet connection, etc. etc.). Not so. Sorry if I missed something here but… the “is speed safe” argument suggests that faster JavaScript is bad because malware operates faster. To me that logic suggests a faster CPU must be worse than a slower one because it will execute malware faster (same for a faster internet connection, etc. etc.). Not so.

]]> By: Rodrigo Asensio http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/2009/06/google-chrome-2-the-good-and-the-disappointing/comment-page-1/#comment-586 Rodrigo Asensio Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:34:08 +0000 http://www.auslogics.com/en/blog/?p=657#comment-586 Yes, you are paranoic. They did a summit to ask developers what would be the better way to do the plugins and they responded and now you can see the alpha part of them. Check out here: http://www.rodrigoasensio.com/?p=360 It is my primary browser since the day it came up. I miss the plugins, but time to time... regards Yes, you are paranoic. They did a summit to ask developers what would be the better way to do the plugins and they responded and now you can see the alpha part of them. Check out here: http://www.rodrigoasensio.com/?p=360
It is my primary browser since the day it came up. I miss the plugins, but time to time…

regards

]]>